THANK YOU FOR VISITING SWEATSCIENCE.COM!
My new Sweat Science columns are being published at www.outsideonline.com/sweatscience. Also check out my new book, THE EXPLORER'S GENE: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map, published in March 2025.
- Alex Hutchinson (@sweatscience)
***
New Jockology column now posted here:
THE QUESTION
Will I get a better workout by walking, running or biking my 5K commute to work?
THE ANSWER
Most commuters strive to be as efficient as possible. To get the best workout (specifically, to burn the most calories), you’re better off being inefficient. [continue reading]
A couple of interesting points have already been raised in the comments section, including one about what “net” calories refers to. In brief:
“Net” is referring to the total calories burned while moving a kilometer MINUS the number of calories you would have burned during that time just by being alive (your “basal metabolic rate”). Otherwise walking gets credited with burning a bunch of extra calories just because it takes longer.
As a rough approximation, running burns about 50% more GROSS calories per kilometre than walking, but twice as many NET calories.
