THANK YOU FOR VISITING SWEATSCIENCE.COM!
My new Sweat Science columns are being published at www.outsideonline.com/sweatscience. Also check out my new book, THE EXPLORER'S GENE: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map, published in March 2025.
- Alex Hutchinson (@sweatscience)
***
A few people have e-mailed me about this University of Calgary study, (“Less is More: Standard Warm-up Causes Fatigue and Less Warm-up Permits Greater Cycling Power Output”) which has received a bunch of press. It seems to run counter to the message from this blog post a few weeks ago, which argued that a hard effort during your warm-up could enhance performance.
The new study had cyclists perform either a “standard” long warm-up (designed in consultation with elite track cyclists and coaches), or an experimental short warm-up. Then they tested performance, and the short warm-up group had a 6.2% advantage in peak power. Okay, cool. This is valuable information. But let me add two caveats:
- What was the “standard” warm-up? It was “about 50 minutes with a graduated intensity that ranged from 60 to 95 per cent of maximal heart rate before ending with several all-out sprints.” That’s one heck of a warm-up. In comparison, the experimental warm-up was “about 15 minutes, and was performed at a lower intensity, ending with just a single sprint.”
- What was the performance test? It was a 30-second Wingate test.
Now, bear in mind what athletes are hoping to achieve with a warm-up. According to the paper, it’s:
[I]ncreased muscle temperature, accelerated oxygen uptake kinetics, increased anaerobic metabolism and postactivation potentiation (PAP) of the muscles.
In the blog post a few weeks ago about the “priming” effect of a hard warm-up effort, the focus was on accelerated oxygen uptake kinetics. But in a 30-second sprint, oxygen kinetics have nothing to do with it. We’re talking about two different animals here.
Bottom line: if you’re a track sprinter who spends nearly an hour warming up at up to 95% of max heart rate, then this study tells you something very important. But if your event is longer than 30 seconds (so that oxygen kinetics matter), and your warm-up tends to be shorter and less intense, don’t assume that this study is telling you to shorten it even more!
Right on the money as always! Thanks for clearing that up for everyone!
I think you should look at some of the new oxygen kinetics studies. Even a small intense effort leads to faster O2 kinetics
Hi Shane: I definitely agree that a short intense effort leads to faster O2 kinetics. But do O2 kinetics make any difference to performance in a 30-s Wingate test? (Serious question. My assumption is it wouldn’t matter, but please correct me if I’m wrong!)
Seen on the globe site today:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/fitness/exercise/fitness-research/why-your-warm-up-may-be-hurting-your-workout/article2046712/?utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Globe%20Life&utm_type=text&utm_content=Why%20your%20warm-up%20may%20be%20hurting%20your%20workout&utm_campaign=87712055
My question is What is the importance of a traditional long warm-up on Wingate test performance?