Home > Uncategorized > Cramping in Ironman triathlons: not dehydration or electrolytes

Cramping in Ironman triathlons: not dehydration or electrolytes

February 3rd, 2011

Another interesting study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, posted online in December while I was away. It’s a prospective study that looked at 209 Ironman triathletes before and after a race, and tried to detect any differences between the 43 who developed muscle cramps and the 166 who didn’t. The major finding is that there was no significant difference in the levels of dehydration or electrolyte loss between the two groups, challenging the prevailing electrolyte-depletion hypothesis of cramps. The cramping group lost 2.8% body mass compared to 3.1% in the non-crampers; crampers’ sodium levels dropped 0.1% (+/- 1.9%), while the non-crampers increased 0.4% (+/- 2.6%).

The study comes from Martin Schwellnus’s group at the University of Cape Town. I wrote about Schwellnus’s theory of “altered neuromuscular control” for cramps last July, after returning from a visit to his lab. At the time, he was analyzing some data that he said suggested that crampers tend to be those who set faster time goals and start faster relative to their fitness, and who have trained more in the final week before the race (thus leaving their muscles fatigued). That suggested that realistic goal setting and an appropriate taper would minimize your risk.

The new study only bears part of that out. The three factors that predicted cramping were (1) faster predicted race time, (2) faster actual race time, and (3) previous history of cramping. Training volumes and paces for the final week before the race were more or less identical in the two groups, which means that in this group of athletes, a bad taper wasn’t to blame.

The fact that faster predicted and actual finishing time was associated with cramping is sort of bad news, because it doesn’t offer any simple solutions. The two groups were matched in terms of training history and personal best performances, so on the surface you’d expect them to aim for similar times. But it turns that those who aimed higher were more susceptible to cramps — and achieved better performances. So it seems (albeit from a single, isolated study) that cramping is just one of the many unavoidable risks associated with getting as close as possible to your limits, especially if you happen to have a (genetically determined?) history of cramping. You’d probably find a similar pattern if you measured the likelihood of dropping out or having a very big positive split: those who aim highest are most likely to blow up or drop out, but are also most likely to produce faster performances.

UPDATE Feb. 3: There’s quite a lively debate on this topic going on over at Slowtwitch. I just posted to address a couple of questions; my response is below:

Interesting (and lively, as usual for this topic!) discussion. A couple of quick points/answers:

“My point is that the result of salt loss measured before/after, only reflect that, not the actual level before.”

The pre-race sodium levels were 139.8 (+/-1.8) in the non-crampers and 139.8 (+/-1.5) in the crampers – so there was no difference in pre-race sodium levels.

“crampers’ sodium levels dropped 0.1% (+/- 1.9%), while the non-crampers increased 0.4% (+/- 2.6%). Doesn’t this bit from the study at least suggest that sodium loss could be a factor???”

One way of trying to understand whether an apparently small difference between two groups of numbers is significant is to look at the “p-value,” which tells you the probability of getting this difference purely by chance. Most scientific studies consider a result significant when p<0.05, meaning there’s only a 5% chance the result could have occurred by chance. In the case of these this data set on % change in sodium levels, p=0.836. That means there’s an 83.6% chance that difference between -0.1% and +0.4% is just random statistical fluctuation, and a 16.4% chance that it represents a real physical difference.

“the user suggesting pickle juice – the reason why it works at replenishing electrolytes is because of the salt content, not really a special characteristic to pickles.”

One of several reasons that researchers don’t believe that electrolytes explain pickle juice’s effect on cramps is the time frame. In the initial pickle juice study, it took an average of 85 seconds for pickle juice to relieve cramps. Earlier studies have found that it takes at least 30 minutes for small volumes of pickle juice to even leave the stomach, let alone be distributed throughout the body.

“It is almost never my working muscles that cramp first, but my stomach one.”

Stomach cramps are a completely different phenomenon than muscle cramps, with a completely different set of causes. Given that electrolyte levels do affect how quickly fluid leaves the stomach, it wouldn’t be at all surprising if you noticed a correlation between electrolyte use and the incidence of stomach cramps.

One last general point (even though I’ve already rambled on far too long): this is a simple correlational study. It most certainly doesn’t disprove the possibility that electrolytes influence muscle cramps through some pathway that isn’t clear to us. But if they are a factor, the question is: why can’t anyone find any solid evidence to show it?

  1. February 9th, 2011 at 22:52 | #1

    I have only done three sprint triathlons but I have experience calf cramping in all three. After the first, I assumed I wasn’t well hydrated but I concentrated on that for the last two and still experience cramps. It really sucks not knowing what causes this. I’m a fairly good athlete in very good shape but I’m still new to the triathlon game.

  2. bruce
    August 21st, 2011 at 13:13 | #2

    I just compleated the Pikes Peak Ascent in a personal worst time of 3:31 due to suffering cramps before 60:00 into the race. I have raced tri,bikes etc since 1983 and am 49. In the last few years race cramping has become regular and I think it may be because I have reduced my caloric intake due to trying to stay trim and just paying closer attention to my eating. During the Ascent I was trained, hydrated but feel maybe my carbohydrate level was low. Since my Wife has gone “Gluten Free” we eat less bread and pasta and I am thinking this could be the cause?

  3. alex
    August 21st, 2011 at 21:38 | #3

    That’s a tricky one, Bruce — the fact that you’ve just started cramping in the past few years means we can’t just blame it on “genetics.” I’ve never seen any evidence that carbohydrate level, on its own, is related to cramping. But proper nutrition (including adequate carbs) is vital to recovery during training. Perhaps the combination of getting older (sorry!) and a change in dietary habits means you’re not recovering from training as well as you used to/should. Several studies have found that inadequate recovery prior to a long race (as indicated by pre-race markers of muscle damage like creatine kinase and lack of adequate taper) make cramping more likely.

  1. March 22nd, 2011 at 09:28 | #1
  2. July 6th, 2011 at 16:23 | #2